STARESSO Plus Portable Espresso Maker vs Wacaco Picopresso
Same class, different tax brackets.
The Picopresso runs ~31% more (listed in different currencies) — the split below is what the gap buys.

STARESSO
US$89–100
The SP300 PLUS is a competent, pocket-friendly manual device that genuinely produces crema-topped espresso from ground coffee wherever hot water is available. Accept that grind consistency a…
Full record & live prices →
Wacaco
US$119–130 · CA$165–170
The Picopresso is the most capable portable hand-pump espresso device on the market for the money, capable of producing shots that can embarrass entry-level electric machines. The trade-off…
Full record & live prices →The split
Where they actually differ
On 6 of 11 measures these two tie. The 5 rows below are the entire argument.
Plus Portable Espresso Maker
Picopresso
The price
Plus Portable Espresso Maker costs less, clearly
US$89–100· CA$165–170
Shot ceiling
Picopresso leads, clearly
Built to last
Picopresso leads, clearly
Push-button convenience
Plus Portable Espresso Maker leads, clearly
Value per dollar
Picopresso leads, clearly
Back-to-back drinks
Plus Portable Espresso Maker leads — neither is built for this
weakerstronger
The counter’s vote
Looks barely figure in either machine’s record — the counter can sit this one out.
Plus Portable Espresso Maker: Spaceship-like kickstand (Plus/Mirage model) draws aesthetic praise; compact form cited as kitchen-friendly, though some find plastic exterior less premium-feeling than steel competitors.
Picopresso: Compact, utilitarian industrial form; genuinely portable appeal drives purchase stories, but no design-award acclaim or "kitchen approval" talk — appreciated for function over form.
Where they tie: milk & steam · ready when you are · reliability record · forgiving to learn on · parts & repair — don’t let a spec sheet invent a difference.
On the counter
The size difference, to scale
So — which one?
Take the Plus Portable Espresso Maker if —
- The difference stays in your pocket — or goes into beans
- You want a button, not a ritual
Take the Picopresso if —
- The shot itself is the hobby
- You are buying once
- Every dollar has to earn its place
Both columns reading true? Take the Plus Portable Espresso Maker and put the difference into fresh, roast-dated beans — they move the cup more than this choice will.
Known weak points
Plus Portable Espresso Maker
Pump becomes sticky and difficult over time; weak included scoop/tamper too small for basket and flimsy plastic construction; plastic-lined brew chamber contact with hot water concerns (BPA-free claimed but undocumented on packaging); milk-frothing feature lukewarm and time-consuming.
Picopresso
Group head cracking under repeated thermal stress reported anecdotally; spring fatigue in pump mechanism; seal degradation over extended use — sparse documentation, not yet community-consensus failures but recurring thread undertones.
For the row-by-row readers
The whole sheet, side by side
Matching rows fade back — the ink is where they differ.
Plus Portable Espresso Maker
Picopresso
Type
Manual
Manual
Heat-up time
0 seconds
0 seconds
Steam power
0/5
0/5
Brew + steam at once
No
No
Guest recovery
1/5
0/5
Shot quality ceiling
2.5/5
3.5/5
PID temperature control
No
No
Milk system
None
None
Removable brew group
Yes
No
Flow control
Yes
Yes
Workflow demand
4/5
5/5
Maintenance
1/5
1/5
Noise
0/5
0/5
Build longevity
2/5
3/5
Dimensions
11 × 9 × 27 cm
7.8 × 7.1 × 10.6 cm
Cup clearance
—
0 cm
One owner each
“Between the filter basket that comes with the Staresso and the 53mm one, you can't go wrong if you want a smooth cup.”
“"I originally got this for the office so I could have drinkable coffee there, but it's been so good and easy to use that the old Delonghi Dedica has been left to collect dust at home."”
Wrong match-up? Change one side → — any two on file compare.
Still torn?
This page weighs them against each other. The finder weighs them against your mornings.
Two minutes of questions — milk, noise, budget, space — scored across everything on file. It’s honest when the answer is neither of these.
Take the two-minute finder →