Mahlkönig E65S GbW vs Mazzer Kony S

Two answers to the same question — the split below is the whole argument.

Mahlkönig E65S GbW

Mahlkönig

E65S GbW

CA$3,199–3,999 · US$2,300–2,800

This is a workhorse cafe grinder that happens to weigh your dose as it grinds, not a home single-doser dressed up in commercial clothes. Buy it for the GbW accuracy and portafilter-detection…

Full record & live prices →
Mazzer Kony S

Mazzer

Kony S

CA$3,200–3,450 · US$2,500–3,600

This is a café workhorse, not a kitchen-counter single-doser: 63mm conical burrs at low RPM buy you thermal stability and dose consistency shot after shot through a rush. Accept the size, th…

Full record & live prices →

The split

Where they actually differ

Measured side by side, they tie on all 6 counts we track — the choice is price, size, and taste in hardware.

Syrup & bodyClarity & sparkle

The E65S GbW leans the balanced middle; the Kony S leans syrup and body. Pick the cup, not the machine.

The counter’s vote

Looks barely figure in either machine’s record — the counter can sit this one out.

E65S GbW: Minimalist commercial form (stainless steel, compact depth) wins kitchen-approval on professional look; color-lock hopper is thoughtful but not praised as a design highlight.

Kony S: Functionally transparent industrial design — no design-purchase pull, neutral counter presence; buyers cite engineering reputation and cafe heritage, never aesthetics.

Where they tie: espresso duty · brew range · reliability record · built to last · value per dollar — don’t let a spec sheet invent a difference.

So — which one?

Take the E65S GbW if —

  • Bright, separated cups are the goal

Take the Kony S if —

  • Syrupy, traditional cups are the goal

The data cannot split them. Take the cheaper one, or the one whose looks you can live with — then stop reading reviews.

Known weak points

E65S GbW

Software glitches on startup reported in early units; thermal cutoff triggered if duty cycle exceeded; scale calibration drift if portafilter weight not zero-referenced before use.

Kony S

High retention requires manual chaining or single-dosing workaround; conical burrs slow to dial on espresso (<0.5g micro-steps difficult); motor noise and ventilation design common minor complaints in residential spaces.

For the row-by-row readers

The whole sheet, side by side

Matching rows fade back — the ink is where they differ.

E65S GbW

Kony S

Class

Midrange

Midrange

Burrs

65mm flat

63mm conical

Drive

Electric

Electric

Adjustment

Stepless

Stepless

Clarity lean

Balanced

Syrup & body

Espresso suitability

4.5/5

4.5/5

Brew versatility

2/5

2/5

Single dosing

No

No

Hopper

1200 g

1300 g

Workflow demand

1/5

1.5/5

Maintenance

3/5

2.5/5

Noise

2.5/5

2.5/5

Build longevity

4/5

4.5/5

Dimensions

19.5 × 28.3 × 58.3 cm

Retention

~3 g

Wrong match-up? Change one side → — any two on file compare.

Still torn?

This page weighs them against each other. The finder weighs them against your mornings.

Two minutes of questions — milk, noise, budget, space — scored across everything on file. It’s honest when the answer is neither of these.

Take the two-minute finder →