Jura Z10 vs Miele CM7750 CoffeeSelect
Two answers to the same question — the split below is the whole argument.
Jura
US$3,999–4,499
The Z10 is as capable as a home super-automatic gets: 40 drink presets, genuine cold extraction, and a self-adjusting conical grinder that shifts between espresso fine and cold-brew coarse w…
Full record & live prices →
Miele
CA$5,499–5,999 · US$4,099–4,499
The CM7750 is a serious, well-engineered super-automatic that delivers repeatable, hands-off milk drinks for multi-user households willing to pay flagship money. You trade any real barista c…
Full record & live prices →The split
Where they actually differ
On 8 of 11 measures these two tie. The 3 rows below are the entire argument.
Z10
CM7750 CoffeeSelect
Reliability record
CM7750 CoffeeSelect leads, decisively
Parts & repair
CM7750 CoffeeSelect leads, clearly
Built to last
CM7750 CoffeeSelect leads, clearly
weakerstronger
The counter’s vote
Looks barely figure in either machine’s record — the counter can sit this one out.
Z10: Modern appliance aesthetic with soft-touch materials and intuitive LCD interface; "kitchen approval" appeal reported in retailer notes, but design is not a primary purchase driver in the community…
CM7750 CoffeeSelect: Appliance-neutral styling; purchasers do not cite design as a driver, nor does it count against it — pure functional kitchen tool.
Where they tie: milk & steam · shot ceiling · back-to-back drinks · ready when you are · forgiving to learn on — don’t let a spec sheet invent a difference.
On the counter
The size difference, to scale
So — which one?
Take the Z10 if —
Hard case to make: the CM7750 CoffeeSelect leads everywhere the data separates them. This one is a deal-day purchase, not a first choice.
Take the CM7750 CoffeeSelect if —
- It has to just work, every day
- You plan to fix, not replace
- You are buying once
The CM7750 CoffeeSelect leads everywhere the data separates them, at the same money — the Z10's case is taste, looks, or a deal you couldn't refuse.
Known weak points
Z10
Rigorous cleaning regimen required for sustained performance; wear on internal components over time due to automation complexity not extensively documented in owner forums relative to price.
CM7750 CoffeeSelect
No major espresso-specific failures documented in available enthusiast sources; Miele's general appliance reliability is noted, but super-automatic-specific failure modes not distinguished in community record.
For the row-by-row readers
The whole sheet, side by side
Matching rows fade back — the ink is where they differ.
Z10
CM7750 CoffeeSelect
Type
Super-automatic (bean-to-cup)
Super-automatic (bean-to-cup)
Heat-up time
~1 min
~1 min
Steam power
3/5
3/5
Brew + steam at once
No
No
Guest recovery
3/5
3.5/5
Shot quality ceiling
2.5/5
2.5/5
PID temperature control
No
No
Milk system
Auto frother
Integrated carafe (one-touch)
One-touch drinks
40
20
Removable brew group
Yes
Yes
Hot-water tap
Yes
Yes
Cup clearance
14 cm
16 cm
Workflow demand
0/5
0.5/5
Maintenance
4/5
2/5
Noise
2/5
2/5
Build longevity
3/5
4/5
Dimensions
32 × 45 × 38 cm
31.1 × 44.5 × 42 cm
One owner each
“I've had better shots – way better shots – from traditional machines, but also way worse shots at many cafes I've visited.”
“The best part of the Miele CM 7750 is the consistency in which it produces the same exact taste cup after cup.”
Wrong match-up? Change one side → — any two on file compare.
Still torn?
This page weighs them against each other. The finder weighs them against your mornings.
Two minutes of questions — milk, noise, budget, space — scored across everything on file. It’s honest when the answer is neither of these.
Take the two-minute finder →