Hario Mini-Slim Plus vs Kingrinder P0
Same class, different tax brackets.
About CA$18 apart — and the gap buys nothing the data can taste.

Hario
CA$45–60 · US$35–45
This is a cheap, honest travel grinder that does one thing well: it grinds fine for pour-over and Aeropress in a package you can drop in a backpack. Accept that the ceramic burrs get sloppy…
Full record & live prices →
Kingrinder
CA$30–40 · US$20–25
This is the grinder you buy when you want a real conical burr for drip coffee without spending real money. Accept the plastic housing and the fact that Kingrinder itself tells you not to pus…
Full record & live prices →The split
Where they actually differ
Measured side by side, they tie on all 6 counts we track — the choice is price, size, and taste in hardware.
Mini-Slim Plus
P0
The price
P0 costs less, decisively
CA$45–60· CA$30–40
weakerstronger
The P0 leans syrup and body; the Mini-Slim Plus leans syrup and body. Pick the cup, not the machine.
The counter’s vote
Looks barely figure in either machine’s record — the counter can sit this one out.
Mini-Slim Plus: Compact, minimalist aesthetics appeal to travelers and desk aesthetes; no major polarization or design-award citations suggest it is functionally appreciated rather than bought for visual statement.
Where they tie: espresso duty · brew range · reliability record · built to last · value per dollar — don’t let a spec sheet invent a difference.
On the counter
The size difference, to scale
So — which one?
Take the Mini-Slim Plus if —
Hard case to make: the P0 leads everywhere the data separates them. This one is a deal-day purchase, not a first choice.
Take the P0 if —
- The difference stays in your pocket — or goes into beans
Measured, they're the same machine in different shells. Take the P0 and put the difference into fresh, roast-dated beans.
Known weak points
Mini-Slim Plus
Ceramic burr breakage under pressure or drop impact; coarse adjustment steps unsuitable for espresso consistency; replacement burr sets not widely available; internal wear accelerates with high-volume filter grinding.
P0
Conical burr drift over time; handle durability complaints in budget hand-grinder forums; inconsistent grind texture for espresso despite conical design.
For the row-by-row readers
The whole sheet, side by side
Matching rows fade back — the ink is where they differ.
Mini-Slim Plus
P0
Class
Hand grinder
Hand grinder
Burrs
38mm conical
38mm conical
Drive
Hand-cranked
Hand-cranked
Adjustment
Stepped (micro)
Stepped (micro)
Clarity lean
Syrup & body
Syrup & body
Espresso suitability
1.5/5
1/5
Brew versatility
2.5/5
2.5/5
Retention
~1 g
—
Single dosing
Yes
Yes
Hopper
24 g
20 g
Workflow demand
4/5
4/5
Maintenance
1/5
1/5
Noise
0.5/5
0/5
Build longevity
2.5/5
2/5
Dimensions
15 × 7.2 × 22 cm
14 × 14 × 4.8 cm
Wrong match-up? Change one side → — any two on file compare.
Still torn?
This page weighs them against each other. The finder weighs them against your mornings.
Two minutes of questions — milk, noise, budget, space — scored across everything on file. It’s honest when the answer is neither of these.
Take the two-minute finder →