Baratza Sette 270 vs Turin DF64 Gen 2
Same class, different tax brackets.
About CA$193 apart — and the gap buys nothing the data can taste.
Baratza
Strong consensusUS$369–499 · CA$550–800
The Sette 270 is the grinder we point people to when they want a serious espresso-focused conical burr setup without spending Niche Zero money. The trade-off you accept is a predominantly pl…
Full record & live prices →
Turin
Strong consensusUS$359–420 · CA$465–500
The DF64 Gen 2 is a competently built, single-dose flat-burr grinder that delivers flat-burr clarity and dial-in consistency well above its price bracket. The trade-off is a purely manual, b…
Full record & live prices →The split
Where they actually differ
On 4 of 7 measures these two tie. The 3 rows below are the entire argument.
Sette 270
DF64 Gen 2
The price
DF64 Gen 2 costs less, decisively
CA$550–800· CA$465–500
Brew range
DF64 Gen 2 leads, clearly
Built to last
DF64 Gen 2 leads, clearly
Quiet operation
DF64 Gen 2 leads, clearly
weakerstronger
The DF64 Gen 2 leans clarity and sparkle; the Sette 270 leans the balanced middle. Pick the cup, not the machine.
The counter’s vote
Looks barely figure in either machine’s record — the counter can sit this one out.
DF64 Gen 2: Appliance-neutral industrial aesthetic; no award citations or kitchen-approval talk in the record — purchased for function and value, not visual appeal.
Where they tie: espresso duty · retention · reliability record · value per dollar — don’t let a spec sheet invent a difference.
On the counter
The size difference, to scale
So — which one?
Take the Sette 270 if —
- Syrupy, traditional cups are the goal
Take the DF64 Gen 2 if —
- Bright, separated cups are the goal
- The difference stays in your pocket — or goes into beans
- You brew more ways than one
- You are buying once
The DF64 Gen 2 leads everywhere the data separates them — and costs less. The Sette 270's case has to come from somewhere the data can't see: the look, the brand, or a used-market deal.
Known weak points
Sette 270
Conical burr flatness degradation over 3–5 years of daily use; occasional reports of inconsistent grind after 500+ hours; motor longevity variable (some fail around 2–3 years, others run 7+); replacement burr set expensive relative to grinder cost.
DF64 Gen 2
Flat burr wear over time (inherent to flat burrs, not specific failure); occasional motor/noise complaints in early units (gen 1 more prevalent); no widespread catastrophic failures documented, but sub-$500 flat burr longevity is inherently lower than conical or significantly more expensive…
For the row-by-row readers
The whole sheet, side by side
Matching rows fade back — the ink is where they differ.
Sette 270
DF64 Gen 2
Class
Midrange
Single dose
Burrs
conical
flat
Drive
Electric
Electric
Clarity lean
Balanced
Clarity & sparkle
Espresso suitability
4/5
4/5
Brew versatility
2/5
3.5/5
Retention
~0.1 g
~0.2 g
Single dosing
Yes
Yes
Hopper
300 g
50 g
Workflow demand
2/5
4/5
Maintenance
2/5
2/5
Noise
4/5
3/5
Build longevity
2.5/5
3.5/5
Dimensions
13 × 24 × 40 cm
13 × 22.5 × 30 cm
One owner each
“So far I'm liking my new DF64 Gen 2. It's my first grinder. I'm very excited about it!”
Wrong match-up? Change one side → — any two on file compare.
Still torn?
This page weighs them against each other. The finder weighs them against your mornings.
Two minutes of questions — milk, noise, budget, space — scored across everything on file. It’s honest when the answer is neither of these.
Take the two-minute finder →